The codebase is small, focused, and has a clear MIT license with limited runtime dependencies. It lacks tests, a README, a security policy, and security scanning, while the organization-backed project provides some ownership context. These safeguards do not compensate for the absence of activity since the initial release.
38%
Total Score
50
100
57
75
The package has had only one release, published about four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and indicating no observed maintenance.
The published artifact has no README, tests, or changelog, and the repository also reports no tests or changelog. Although tests and changelogs are not expected in the artifact, the missing README and repository quality evidence reduce transparency.
The repository has zero stars and one fork, showing little community adoption or visible validation. Popularity is supporting evidence only, so this modestly reinforces rather than drives the abandonment concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools are reported. That limits automated detection coverage for a package with no other compensating security process shown.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.3 | — | — |
everyworkflow/core-bundle Version dev-main | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.