escuccim/larablog
Documentation, tests, a changelog, and an MIT license provide a solid package foundation. The lone maintainer and absent security policy offer limited support evidence for a release that has not been updated in about eight years.
38%
Total Score
25
75
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest registry release was about eight years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment despite the package having 14 historical releases.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the last push being about eight years ago, this indicates that maintenance has effectively stopped.
The registry has one maintainer, which is a narrow support base for a user-owned project. This is a secondary concern because the much stronger evidence is the absence of recent activity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment by itself.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, although it is less significant than the package's prolonged maintenance gap.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Eric Scuccimarra |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 roumen/feed Version ^2.10 | — | — |
laracasts/flash Version ^2.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.2 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ~5.1 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 8 years ago
- Created
- 9 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.