ernestdefoe/giveaways

Healthy and actively developed, with a clear repository and frequent releases. The main caveats are its very young history, lack of tests and changelog, and limited security-process evidence.

Latest v0.2.3

Packagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health checks

Maintainers

One registry publishing account is a modest bus-factor concern, although the linked repository shows two active contributors and the owner is also the repository owner.

Package scaffolding

A substantial README and GitHub Releases are present, but neither the package nor repository includes tests or a changelog. For an extension with database, scheduler, and user-facing behavior, the absence of tests is a real maintenance gap.

Project backing

The registry namespace and repository are owned by the same individual, providing consistent ownership, but there is no organization backing to broaden institutional maintenance capacity.

Repo issue activity

There is one open issue and no issues or pull requests were opened or closed in the last month, providing limited evidence about community support and issue-handling responsiveness.

Repo popularity

The repository has only 1 star and no forks or watchers, so there is little external adoption evidence. This is supporting evidence rather than a decisive health problem for a young package.