erikaheidi/autodocs
Tests, a changelog, and release notes provide useful project evidence, while the package has a small footprint and no security policy. The workflow audit found no dangerous patterns, but two of three actions are unpinned.
61%
Total Score
50
100
81
67
Health Score Breakdown
The package and repository are owned by the same individual account. That is consistent ownership, but it indicates a limited organizational backing structure.
The package has only two releases, both in September 2023, and none in the last 12 months despite being about three years old. This is strong evidence of limited ongoing maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old release history, this increases abandonment risk.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent issue or pull-request activity. This is neutral for a small package but provides little evidence of active maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools are reported. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than a severe risk.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
No maintainer information available.
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 minicli/minicli Version ^4.2 | — | — |
minicli/stencil Version ^0.2.1 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 3 years ago
- Created
- 3 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.