Clear documentation, tests, licensing, and a small dependency set make integration straightforward. The project has one publisher and little community activity. Its workflow also leaves both external actions unpinned.
64%
Total Score
50
100
89
75
Only one account has registry publishing access. That is a limited publishing base and increases continuity risk when combined with the lack of recent activity.
The repository is owned by an individual rather than an organization, so the single-publisher and limited-maintenance evidence is not offset by visible organizational backing.
The package is about 680 days old with six releases, but it has had no releases in the last 12 months, which is a maintenance concern for a library dependency.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the concern that maintenance has slowed or stopped.
The repository has one star, no forks, and one watcher. This is weak supporting evidence of adoption, though popularity alone does not determine whether a small package is healthy.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.0|^3.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^7.0|^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.