Tests, a clear README, and an MIT license make the package easier to evaluate and maintain. Its single release and 629 days without another release or recent commits leave maintenance capacity uncertain.
58%
Total Score
50
83
50
One registry maintainer creates a thin publishing base and increases continuity risk. The linked repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so there is no provided project-backing evidence to offset that concern.
This is the package's only release, published 629 days ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is a meaningful maintenance concern, although a small stable package can remain useful without frequent releases.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, providing no recent evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository has no security policy, which limits transparency around vulnerability reporting and response. This is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
mpdf/mpdf Version ^8.2 | — | — |
eftec/bladeone Version ^4.16 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.