Clear documentation, tests, release notes, and a matching source repository make integration straightforward. Support capacity is limited by one maintainer, no recent commits, and no documented security process.
67%
Total Score
50
100
94
88
Registry publishing is handled by one individual, so the project has a thin apparent maintainer base. The matching user-owned repository and recent releases provide some support, but not much bus-factor resilience.
The repository is owned by an individual rather than an organization, and the registry namespace matches that owner. This is consistent ownership evidence, but it offers limited organizational continuity.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is a real support concern, although the recent release history provides some compensating evidence.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. For a small library this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. This reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and response expectations, without showing that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version >=10.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.