Documentation, tests, licensing, and a matching source repository provide a workable foundation. Security scanning and a security policy are absent, adding transparency risk alongside the maintenance concerns.
48%
Total Score
0
100
78
75
The package has had only one release, published about 3 years and 8 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of stalled maintenance for a library dependency.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, reinforcing the long gap since the only registry release rather than showing ongoing maintenance.
The repository has 0 stars, 1 fork, and 0 watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these very low signals provide little external evidence of adoption or review.
Composer is used as the build tool, which fits the package, but no security scanning tools are present. The missing scanning is a modest supply-chain hygiene gap.
No security policy was found in the repository. This is a transparency and response-process gap, though it is less serious than the maintenance evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
monolog/monolog Version ^1.12|^2.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ~7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.