The MIT license, no install-time scripts, and a small dependency footprint reduce friction. The README labels the project beta, and the linked repository does not identify the package.
38%
Total Score
25
100
63
75
The package has only one release, published about 13 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old last push, this materially increases abandonment risk.
A readable README is included and documents the package, while the absence of packaged tests and a changelog is normal for published artifacts and is not a gap here. The README also identifies the project as beta.
The source repository is owned by an individual rather than an organization, so there is no observed organizational backing to compensate for the thin maintenance history.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. This raises concern that the linked source may not clearly correspond to the published package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
elefant/app-installer Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.