Package Health

ekandreas/testrunner

A single maintainer, no license, and no security policy leave limited transparency and continuity. The package is small and clearly documented, but its maintenance capacity is weak.

Latest 0.3.1PackagistPackagist

35%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

50

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

83

Health Score Breakdown

Licensedanger

No declared license, license file, or repository license file was found. That creates a material adoption and redistribution problem rather than a cosmetic gap.

Release historydanger

The latest release was in January 2016, with no releases in the last 12 months and only four releases overall. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a package a developer would depend on.

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry maintainer is listed. Because the project is user-owned rather than organization-backed, this leaves a thin continuity base.

Project backingcaution

The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, confirming ownership alignment but not organizational backing or broader maintenance capacity.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has one star, zero forks, and one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these values provide no meaningful external maturity signal.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Andreas Ek

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
10 years ago
Created
10 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform