The README is extremely brief, and the project has no security policy or automated security scanning. MIT licensing, a matching repository, and no install-time scripts reduce adoption friction.
53%
Total Score
50
75
75
The package includes a README, but it is only 19 characters long and offers almost no consumer guidance. Missing tests and a changelog are expected packaging gaps and do not lower the score here.
This package has published only one release, with the latest release roughly three years ago and none in the last 12 months. That provides little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the single-release history, this raises maintenance and abandonment concerns.
The repository has zero stars, one fork, and one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counts provide little evidence of a broad user or contributor base.
The linked repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is not evidence of a security incident.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.