Package Health

ebrana/elasticsearch

This release appears generally safe to depend on from a maintenance and transparency perspective: it is licensed under MIT, has a substantial 527-file source and package tree, tests, changelog, build tooling, recent release activity, and an active non-archived repository with 31 commits in the last 3 months. The main concerns are that the project is young with only three releases, all recent commit activity comes from one contributor, the repository has no security scanning or security policy, and its popularity is minimal. Organization ownership and a merged pull request provide some compensation for the concentrated contributor base, but the package remains less mature and less resilient than an established dependency.

Latest v1.1.0PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

88

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

83

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

80

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

The package is only 182 days old with three releases and a median release interval of about 91 days. This shows ongoing publication but limited maturity and a still-short operating history.

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made all 31 commits in the last 3 months, creating a clear single-maintainer continuity risk. The organization-owned repository provides some potential handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only four watchers. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counts provide little external validation or community resilience.

Repo toolingcaution

Make and Composer are used for build/development workflows, but no security scanning tools are configured. The build tooling is positive while the missing security automation is a hygiene gap.

Security policycaution

The repository has no SECURITY.md or other detected security policy. This reduces vulnerability-reporting transparency, although it is not by itself evidence of unsafe code.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
psr/cache
Version ^3.0
—
—
doctrine/collections
Version ~2.2.2
—
—
elasticsearch/elasticsearch
Version ~v9.3.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
16 days ago
Created
6 months ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform