Package Health

e-panel/penghargaan-module

The MIT license, matching repository, and organization ownership provide useful transparency. Maintenance evidence is weak, with no security policy or scanning and almost no community activity.

Latest 2.0PackagistPackagist

45%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

64

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The package has only one release, published about five years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, providing little supporting evidence of adoption or external review. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this is a moderate concern rather than a verdict.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tool is configured. This weakens supply-chain hygiene, though it does not by itself show unsafe behavior.

Repository archivedcaution

The repository is not archived, which is a positive counterweight, but it was last pushed about five years ago and shows no recent maintenance.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response practices undocumented. For a small, inactive project, this adds transparency and maintenance risk.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Noviyanto Rahmadi

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
5 years ago
Created
5 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform