The MIT license, matching repository, and organization ownership provide useful transparency. Maintenance evidence is weak, with no security policy or scanning and almost no community activity.
45%
Total Score
100
64
75
The package has only one release, published about five years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, providing little supporting evidence of adoption or external review. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this is a moderate concern rather than a verdict.
Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tool is configured. This weakens supply-chain hygiene, though it does not by itself show unsafe behavior.
The repository is not archived, which is a positive counterweight, but it was last pushed about five years ago and shows no recent maintenance.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response practices undocumented. For a small, inactive project, this adds transparency and maintenance risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.