Active development, frequent releases, tests, and an organization-backed repository support the codebase. Workflow findings and the repository’s lack of a package reference add supply-chain uncertainty.
45%
Total Score
100
81
83
Packagist marks the entire package abandoned and names dunglas/api-bundle as its replacement. This is a substantial adoption and maintenance risk despite the current release activity.
The linked repository name does not match this package and its README does not mention the package. Although a monorepo can legitimately contain subpackages, this leaves uncertainty about the exact package-to-source relationship.
All five workflows were analyzed, but the audit found a high-confidence template-injection issue, archived actions, and ad hoc package installs; one workflow also grants top-level write permissions. The pull_request_target trigger has no untrusted checkout or script-injection sink, so these are hygiene and supply-chain concerns rather than a standalone critical verdict.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/cache Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
psr/container Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
symfony/asset Version ^7.4 || ^8.0 | — | — |
composer/semver Version ^3.4 | — | — |
symfony/web-link Version ^7.4 || ^8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.