The small codebase has clear packaging, a matching repository, and organization backing. Its lack of a security policy and security scanning leaves maintenance and response practices less transparent.
58%
Total Score
75
83
50
The latest release was published about three and a half years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, though the repository was pushed more recently.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, which weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance. The repository is not archived, so this is a caution rather than an abandonment verdict.
Composer is used for the build, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The absence of scanning lowers assurance about ongoing maintenance practices.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and response procedures. This is a hygiene and maintenance concern, not a severe dependency risk on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
drutiny/drutiny Version ^3.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.