divineomega/laravel-route-restrictor

Registry deprecationdanger

Packagist marks the entire package abandoned and names jord-jd/laravel-route-restrictor as its replacement. This is a severe adoption concern even though the assessed release is otherwise current.

Repo bus factorcaution

All recent commit activity came from one contributor, leaving maintenance dependent on a single active person. The repository owner is an individual rather than an organization, so there is no shown organizational handoff capacity.

Repo commit activitycaution

Only 1 commit was recorded in the last 3 months, indicating limited recent maintenance activity. The recent release provides some compensating evidence, so this is a caution rather than a severe abandonment signal by itself.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is secondary to the package-level abandonment notice.

Workflow auditcaution

The workflow scopes permissions read-only and has no detected dangerous audit findings, but both analyzed action references are unpinned. That leaves avoidable build-integrity risk while remaining a hygiene concern.