The repository matches the package, is active, and is not archived. A useful README and security scanning help, but no security policy is published; wait for a longer maintenance record before relying on it broadly.
55%
Total Score
67
100
88
75
The manifest declares GPL-3.0-or-later and license files are present, but the artifact also contains MIT and Apache-2.0 text that is not covered by the declaration. This creates licensing clarity risk for consumers.
The package is only 1 day old despite 14 releases, with releases arriving roughly every 18 minutes. That shows active initial publishing but not an established maintenance record.
One contributor made all 2 recent commits, leaving maintenance fully concentrated in a single person. The matching user-owned repository provides no organizational handoff evidence to offset that concentration.
Only 2 commits were recorded in the last 3 months. Because the repository itself is only 1 day old, this is partly expected, but it provides little evidence of sustained maintenance yet.
The repository has no published security policy. This is a transparency gap for a package that integrates into a CMS, although it is not by itself evidence of abandonment.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
contao/faq-bundle Version ^5.7 || ^6.0 | — | — |
contao/core-bundle Version ^5.7 || ^6.0 | — | — |
contao/news-bundle Version ^5.7 || ^6.0 | — | — |
contao/calendar-bundle Version ^5.7 || ^6.0 | — | — |
contao/comments-bundle Version ^5.7 || ^6.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.