It is MIT-licensed, has a matching repository, documented release notes, and no install-time scripts. The focused dependency set is sensible, but limited security and maintenance evidence makes long-term support less certain.
61%
Total Score
75
100
83
75
Ten releases were published in a concentrated period, but the latest release was followed by no recorded releases for roughly eight months. That pattern suggests maintenance may have stalled after the initial launch.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the release-history pause, this is a meaningful maintenance and abandonment concern.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is weak supporting evidence of adoption, but popularity alone does not outweigh the direct maintenance signals.
Composer is used for the build, but no security-scanning tool is configured. This is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations undocumented.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^5.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.