The MIT license, matching repository, release notes, and organization backing improve transparency. There is no security policy, and the workflow uses an unpinned action, leaving some maintenance and build-hygiene gaps.
58%
Total Score
75
88
75
The package has only two releases, both published about eight months ago and nearly simultaneously, with no later release activity. This limits evidence of an established maintenance cadence.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a dormant project. No provided signal shows compensating recent maintenance.
The repository has no published security policy, which reduces transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. The package's license and organization backing do not replace this process.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no audit findings and job-level permissions, but its one action reference is unpinned. That is a limited build-integrity hygiene gap rather than a severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^5.0.0 | — | — |
verbb/formie Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
darkaonline/ripcord Version ^0.3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.