The package is clearly documented and licensed, with a maintained source tree and release notes. Its small scale and organization ownership make the remaining gaps less concerning than they would be for an abandoned project.
78%
Total Score
67
100
50
One contributor made all four commits in the last three months, so maintenance depends heavily on a single active person. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity but does not remove the concentration risk.
The repository had four commits in the last three months, showing recent work, but all activity came from one maintainer. That creates some continuity risk despite the recent cadence.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and response-process gap, though it is not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no untrusted checkouts, injection findings, or excessive top-level permissions. However, all seven action references are unpinned, leaving a supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
decodelabs/clip Version ^0.6 | — | — |
decodelabs/atlas Version ^0.14 | — | — |
decodelabs/hatch Version ^0.1.4 | — | — |
decodelabs/lucid Version ^0.8 | — | — |
decodelabs/chorus Version ^0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.