The project has a clear MIT license, tests, security scanning, and a recent stable release. Its single maintainer, no commits in three months, and entirely unpinned workflow actions leave meaningful maintenance and build-reproducibility concerns.
68%
Total Score
63
100
94
75
Only one account has registry publishing access. Because the repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, this represents a real resilience concern if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but both identify an individual user rather than an organization, so ownership is coherent without providing organizational continuity.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. The recent release partly offsets this, but the lack of current development activity is a maintenance concern.
The repository has no stars or forks and only one watcher. Low popularity is supporting context rather than a verdict, but it provides little evidence of a broad user or contributor base.
No security policy is present. This is a transparency gap for reporting vulnerabilities, though the repository does use Psalm and the package is small.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laminas/laminas-hydrator Version ^4.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.