Clear documentation, repository tests, a matching MIT license, and recent releases support adoption. Maintenance still depends on one active contributor, while workflows use broad permissions and unpinned actions. Organization backing helps, but does not remove that continuity risk.
66%
Total Score
83
100
93
50
The package runs a post-autoload-dump install-time script. This adds execution during installation, but the signal does not show a dangerous command or an unusual number of scripts.
All eight recent commits came from one contributor, so maintenance continuity depends heavily on a single person. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity but does not eliminate the concentration risk.
The repository has one star and no forks, so there is little independent adoption evidence. Popularity is supporting evidence only and does not outweigh the active repository signals.
The repository has no published security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations unclear for consumers.
All 13 action references are unpinned, and four workflows grant top-level write access. The audit also reports high-confidence bot-condition and template-injection findings, but no untrusted checkout or script-injection sink was found, so these are workflow-hygiene concerns rather than a severe standalone risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/contracts Version ^10.0||^11.0||^12.0||^13.0 | — | — |
spatie/opening-hours Version ^4.0.0 | — | — |
spatie/laravel-package-tools Version ^1.16.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.