Tests, release notes, and clear licensing improve confidence for consumers. Maintenance is concentrated in one recent contributor, and all 17 workflow actions are unpinned, so supply-chain hygiene is not exemplary.
78%
Total Score
83
94
50
All 3 recent commits came from one contributor, concentrating short-term maintenance responsibility. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. That leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented, which is a minor transparency concern.
Both workflows were fully analyzed with no high- or medium-confidence audit findings, no untrusted checkout or injection sinks, and no broad write permissions. However, all 17 action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
doctrine/orm Version 2.11.* | — | — |
doctrine/persistence Version ^2.2 | — | — |
doctrine/event-manager Version ^1.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.