The codebase is small and easy to inspect, with a clear MIT license and no install-time scripts. Its single-maintainer history and lack of security or workflow tooling leave little evidence of ongoing care.
35%
Total Score
25
69
83
The package has only two releases, with the latest published about 12 years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a dependency that may need compatibility fixes.
There have been zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the latest push being about 12 years ago. This materially raises abandonment risk.
One registry maintainer is consistent with a small user-owned project, but it leaves little visible redundancy if that person is no longer available.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, so the link between the registry artifact and source repository is less transparent.
The repository has one star, one fork, and one watcher, indicating very limited community adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than decisive proof, but it offers little backup for an inactive project.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/symfony Version 2.3.* | — | — |
creof/doctrine2-spatial Version >=0.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.