The project has no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, and all 27 workflow actions are unpinned. Clear licensing, tests in the repository, release notes, and organization backing provide useful transparency, but the maintenance evidence is still thin.
68%
Total Score
75
100
88
75
The package is very young at 96 days and has only two releases, both within about one day, so its long-term maintenance pattern is not yet established.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. For a package released only about three months ago, that is a meaningful maintenance warning.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is weak supporting evidence, but the package is only 96 days old, so it is not decisive on its own.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
All 27 analyzed action references are unpinned, so workflow dependencies can change without a repository change. The audit found no untrusted checkout, script injection, or high-severity issue; one workflow has top-level write permissions, but no untrusted trigger was observed.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
cycle/orm Version ^2.18 | — | — |
cycle/database Version ^2.20 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.