There is no license declaration or license file, and the repository has no security policy or security scanning. The small, coherent package has a README, matching repository, stable version, and no install-time scripts.
52%
Total Score
50
100
75
88
Neither the package nor the linked repository provides a recognised license declaration or license file. This creates a real adoption and redistribution concern.
The package is about two years old but has only two releases, both published close together, with no release in the last 12 months. This indicates limited release maintenance, although the linked repository was pushed recently.
No commits or active maintainers were recorded in the last three months. The recent push recorded by the repository partly offsets this, but current maintenance activity remains thin.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. This offers little independent evidence of maturity, though low popularity alone does not make a small package unsafe to depend on.
The project uses Make and Composer, but no security scanning tool was detected. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than a severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nategood/httpful Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.