Clear documentation, tests, licensing, and a small runtime dependency set support adoption. The single-user project has no security policy, and its workflows use unpinned actions, increasing maintenance and build-hygiene concerns.
51%
Total Score
50
100
92
75
One registry maintainer is consistent with the linked repository being user-owned, but it leaves the project dependent on a single publisher.
The package has had no release in the last 12 months, and all three releases occurred within a short period on its first day. This is a meaningful sign of inactivity for a package nearly two years old.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the lack of recent releases and indicating no observed ongoing maintenance.
The repository has no published security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling security issues.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, or audit findings, and one scopes permissions at job level. However, all seven action references are unpinned, creating avoidable build reproducibility and dependency-update risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
league/commonmark Version ^2.5 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.