Package Health

cullylarson/phugly

The MIT license, matching source repository, tests, and minimal dependencies make the code easier to inspect. A single maintainer and no security policy reduce resilience and transparency, while nearly eight years without maintenance remains the dominant concern.

Latest 1.5.2PackagistPackagist

43%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

25

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

80

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The latest release was published in February 2018, about eight years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the package having eight historical releases.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The repository is not archived, but there is no observed recent maintenance.

Maintainerscaution

One registry maintainer is a thin publishing base for a user-owned project, leaving limited resilience if that maintainer becomes unavailable.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, so it provides no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though not as serious as the prolonged inactivity.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Cully Larson

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
8 years ago
Created
9 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform