Tests, a changelog, a license, and two runtime dependencies make the package straightforward to assess. Its organization-owned repository and recent publishing help offset the limited contributor activity.
72%
Total Score
67
100
94
75
One contributor made all commits in the last three months, creating a concentrated maintenance path. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.
Only one commit was recorded in the last three months, so recent repository activity is limited despite the current release history. This warrants some maintenance caution.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and supply-chain hygiene gap, not evidence of unsafe code.
The repository has no security policy. That leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations unspecified, which modestly reduces transparency.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
smile/elasticsuite Version * | — | — |
creativestyle/magesuite-sorting Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.