crasp/dingtalk
Tests, documentation, licensing, and a coherent source tree are in place. A single-star repository, no recent commits, and no security policy leave limited evidence of ongoing support.
42%
Total Score
25
100
75
83
Health Score Breakdown
This is the package's only release, published more than three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of stalled maintenance for a library expected to track an external service.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long release gap and indicating no recent maintenance capacity.
The registry lists one maintainer account. This is a limited bus factor, though registry access alone does not establish who actively maintains the project.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 0 watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these very low levels provide little external validation or community support.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and disclosure gap, although it is less serious than the package's demonstrated maintenance inactivity.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 张铭阳 |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 crasp/http Version ^1.0 | — | — |
pimple/pimple Version ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/cache Version ^3.3 || ^4.0 || ^5.0 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ^1.23 || ^2.0 | — | — |
psr/simple-cache Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 3 years ago
- Created
- 3 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.