MIT licensing, a matching repository, and organizational ownership improve transparency. The small dependency surface, release notes, security policy, and clean workflow audit provide useful safeguards, though action references are not pinned.
62%
Total Score
67
100
88
83
The package has 22 releases over about 6 years, but its latest registry release was about 2 years and 6 months ago and it had no releases in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern despite its previously regular median release interval of about 28 days.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months. This reinforces the long gap since the latest package release and raises abandonment concern.
There were three open issues and three open pull requests, but no new or closed issues or pull requests in the last month. This suggests limited recent project interaction.
The repository uses Composer for builds, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap, while the build tooling itself is appropriate.
All 3 workflows were analyzed with no reported audit findings, no untrusted checkouts, and no script injection. However, all 3 of 3 action references are unpinned, which leaves build inputs less reproducible.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^4.0.0-RC2|^5.0.0-beta.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.