A small dependency set, MIT licensing, tests, and a repository that matches the package make its structure clear. The organization-owned project is not archived, but its maintenance evidence is too weak for a new dependency.
42%
Total Score
50
100
75
50
The latest release was published more than three years ago, and there were no releases in the last 12 months. Eight releases since 2018 show some history, but the current release cadence is inactive.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long release gap and leaving little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
There was no issue or pull-request activity in the last month, with one issue still open. This is consistent with a project that may no longer be actively supported.
The repository has seven stars and one fork, indicating a small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but this provides little compensating evidence for the maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and response expectations, especially for a framework package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.