Package Health

corpus/loggers

MIT licensing, tests, and a focused dependency set support straightforward adoption. Organization backing and recent repository activity help, though one contributor and unpinned workflow actions reduce resilience.

Latest v0.5.0PackagistPackagist

82%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

83

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

100

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Repo bus factorcaution

All recent commits come from one contributor, creating a real continuity risk. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity but does not remove the concentration.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, not evidence of unsafe code.

Workflow auditcaution

The single workflow was fully analyzed with no injection or high-severity findings, but both action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Jesse Donat

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
psr/log
Version ^1 || ^2 || ^3
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
4 months ago
Created
3 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform