The small dependency set, passing-looking test scaffolding, and package README reduce adoption friction. However, the release has no license and the project shows no recent maintenance or security policy, so pinning it carries substantial abandonment risk.
38%
Total Score
33
100
72
83
This is the package's only release, published 11 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly limits evidence of ongoing maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the one-release history, this is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
No declared license, license file, or repository license file was detected. This creates a material legal and transparency concern for dependency adoption.
The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization, and no organizational backing is shown. This leaves a thin visible support structure for an inactive package.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent activity. This is consistent with a quiet, inactive project, though it is less severe than evidence of unresolved maintenance problems.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.