The README, changelog, release notes, and small runtime dependency set make integration reasonably clear. The MIT license file conflicts with the proprietary manifest declaration, while the repository has recorded no commits in the last three months and has no security scanning or policy.
58%
Total Score
75
100
81
83
The artifact contains an MIT license file, but the package manifest declares the license as proprietary. That mismatch creates avoidable uncertainty for adopters despite the presence of a license file.
This is the only release, published 194 days ago, so there is not enough release history to demonstrate sustained maintenance. The single initial release is a caution rather than evidence of abandonment on its own.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. For a plugin that performs security monitoring and access-control functions, this is a meaningful maintenance concern.
Composer is used for the build, but no security-scanning tools are present. The missing scanning reduces repository hygiene and transparency for a security-focused plugin.
The repository has no security policy. That leaves vulnerability reporting and disclosure expectations undocumented for a plugin whose stated purpose includes security features.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^5.0.0 | — | — |
s1lentium/iptools Version ^1.2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.