The package has a clear MIT license, tests, release notes, and a matching source repository. It lacks a security policy, and its publishing workflow raises a trusted-publishing hygiene concern.
68%
Total Score
75
94
67
The package has had no registry release in the last 12 months, and its latest release was over two years ago. A recent repository push provides some evidence of ongoing interest but does not restore release cadence.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the three months measured. The recent repository push partly offsets this, but the observed development activity remains thin.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, though it is not by itself evidence of unsafe code.
All five workflows were analyzed, use read-only permissions, and have no unpinned actions or untrusted checkout findings. The high-confidence trusted-publishing finding warrants caution, while the low-confidence cache-poisoning finding is only a minor hygiene concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.