The README, MIT licensing, and compact source tree make the package easy to inspect. Its single-maintainer profile and absent security policy leave little operational support for a package that has not changed since 2020.
38%
Total Score
50
56
50
The package has only one release, published about six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository name matches the package, but its README does not mention codicastudio/tests-admin. The README instead documents Nova Assertions and instructs users to install another package, creating a meaningful package-identity and provenance concern.
The repository is not archived, but its last push was about six years ago, consistent with the package's single-release history and inactivity.
Only one registry publishing maintainer is listed. This is a thin publishing base and provides limited resilience if that maintainer stops maintaining the package.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. Given the repository's age, this reinforces the lack of visible maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.