The README and MIT declaration make the package understandable and legally usable. Its tiny project footprint offers little evidence of sustained maintenance or security oversight, so pinning this old release carries meaningful adoption risk.
35%
Total Score
100
64
50
This is the only release, published nearly six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That long period without a new release is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The artifact includes a substantial README and a GitHub release for this version, which helps consumers understand the package. It has no tests or changelog, and the repository also reports no tests, reducing maintenance transparency.
The repository name matches the package, but its README does not mention the package name and instead documents a differently named media-library package. That mismatch raises concern that the published package may be piggybacking on unrelated repository documentation.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not required for a healthy package, but these counters provide no supporting evidence of adoption or community oversight.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency and response-capacity gap for a package handling uploaded media.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
codicastudio/media-library Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.