The repository has no recent issue activity, no security policy, and no security scanning; its tiny codebase and single registry maintainer offer little evidence of ongoing support. The MIT license and clear README are positives, but they do not offset the maintenance gap.
40%
Total Score
50
100
72
83
This package has had only one release, published nearly six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
Only one registry account has publish access. This is a limited publishing base for a user-owned project and increases continuity risk, although access records do not prove who actively maintains it.
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but the owner is a user account rather than an organization. This supports package identity but offers limited evidence of institutional backing.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. Combined with the old last push, this supports a lack of ongoing maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counts provide no external sign of adoption or support.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
codicastudio/excel Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.