codicastudio/calendar-links

Release historydanger

The package has had only one release, published about six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is the strongest evidence of stalled maintenance, though the repository is not archived.

Package scaffoldingcaution

The artifact includes a README entry, but it is empty; the source repository has tests and the package uses GitHub releases. The tests provide useful project evidence, while the empty consumer documentation is a minor gap.

Repo issue activitycaution

There are no new or closed issues or pull requests in the last month, although one pull request remains open. This provides limited evidence of current activity and reinforces the maintenance concern.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, so there is little visible community support. Popularity is only supporting evidence and does not outweigh the available tests and project structure.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap, but it is less serious than missing source or an archived project.