Package Health

codeq/linkchecker

This release has strong evidence of active development and reasonable package hygiene: it is a stable major release, was published recently, has a maintained and unarchived organizational repository, includes tests and a license, and has no install-time scripts. However, Packagist marks the package as abandoned, which is a severe adoption risk even though the repository shows recent activity; the replacement is listed as the same package, so the deprecation reason is unclear rather than reassuring. The very concentrated commit activity and absence of security scanning and a security policy add secondary concerns. Treat this release as unsuitable for a new dependency unless the abandonment status is clarified and the package is confirmed to remain supported.

Latest v4.0.3PackagistPackagist

24%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

75

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

78

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Registry deprecationdanger

Packagist marks the package as abandoned (`is_deprecated: true`), which is a severe dependency-maintenance risk. The listed replacement is the same package, so the ambiguity does not compensate for the explicit deprecation status.

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made about 89.7% of the 29 recent commits, while two others contributed only 2 and 1 commits. The organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but the observed activity remains highly concentrated.

Repo issue activitycaution

There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. With recent commits this is not evidence of abandonment, but it provides little independent evidence of community support.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has modest popularity with 8 stars, 3 forks, and 1 watcher. This is limited supporting evidence but is not by itself a health failure for a specialized package.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used as a build tool, but no security scanning tools are configured. The build setup is appropriate, while the missing scanning is a modest transparency and security-hygiene gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
psr/log
Version ^1.1 || ^2.0 || ^3.0
—
—
neos/neos
Version 7 - 8 || dev-master
—
—
league/csv
Version ^9.1
—
—
spatie/crawler
Version ^8.0
—
—
neos/swiftmailer
Version ^7.3.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
1 month ago
Created
4 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform