codelips/dooracle
The MIT license and lack of install-time scripts reduce avoidable adoption concerns. Its very short README and absent security policy provide limited guidance and transparency for a library.
38%
Total Score
50
75
Health Score Breakdown
The package has had only two releases, both in June 2019, with no releases in the last 12 months despite being about 7 years old. This strongly suggests abandonment risk.
A README is present, but it is only 31 characters long and offers little integration guidance for a library. Missing tests and changelog files are normal packaging practice and are not concerns here.
The repository is not archived, which is a positive, but its last push was in June 2019 and does not offset the long period without observed maintenance.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency for reporting and handling issues. This is a secondary concern compared with the package's long maintenance gap.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 codelips |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 catfan/medoo Version ^1.6 | — | — |
topthink/framework Version ~5.1 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 7 years ago
- Created
- 7 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.