codeia/bloom
The project includes tests and a complete source tree, but its license files disagree. Its tiny footprint and absent security policy add maintenance and transparency concerns.
38%
Total Score
0
100
63
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was published about 9 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. The package had only four releases, so there is little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers during the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap and raising abandonment risk.
The artifact declares MIT, but its LICENSE file was detected as BSD-2-Clause. Although a license is present in both the artifact and repository, the mismatch should be resolved before adoption.
The package contains tests and the repository also has tests, which supports basic project maturity. However, the published artifact has no README, reducing consumer-facing documentation for this framework library.
The repository has zero stars, one fork, and one watcher, providing little external evidence of adoption or community support. Low popularity is supporting evidence rather than proof of poor quality.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Mon Zafra |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 guzzlehttp/psr7 Version ^1.3 | — | — |
codeia/di-senpai Version ^0.1.5 | — | — |
nikic/fast-route Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 9 years ago
- Created
- 10 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.