Consumer documentation and project transparency are especially limited for a library package. The small source tree, missing tests, and repository/package name mismatch make maintenance and provenance harder to verify.
38%
Total Score
0
100
63
67
The package has only 3 releases, all ending nearly four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the short early release interval.
The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the release history showing no activity since October 2022. No provided signal compensates for this prolonged inactivity.
The published artifact and linked repository each contain only composer.json. Such a minimal tree makes the implementation and maintenance story difficult to verify for a library package.
The package has no README, tests, or changelog, and the repository reports none either. Missing tests and changelog are normal packaging gaps, but the absent README reduces consumer transparency for this library.
The repository name does not match the package name, and the README could not be checked for a package mention. That leaves uncertainty about whether the linked repository is the actual source for this package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
codegenixuk/infinite-scroll Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.