coconutcraig/laravel-postmark
Clear licensing, repository tests, and a security policy improve confidence. Workflow actions are unpinned and no security scanning is configured, so routine maintenance review remains appropriate.
86%
Total Score
100
94
100
Health Score Breakdown
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. That is a limited transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. However, all 3 action references are unpinned, which is a modest reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene gap.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Craig Paul |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 illuminate/http Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/mail Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 1 month ago
- Created
- 9 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.