cnp/wp-theme-hooks

The repository is minimal, with no tests, changelog, README, or security policy, though it has a valid MIT declaration and no install-time scripts. Its only release and commit were about 10 years ago, with no recent contributors or meaningful adoption, making future fixes uncertain.

Latest v1.0

Packagist

42%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The package has had one release, with the latest published about 10 years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, though a small stable package may not need frequent releases.

Repo commit activity

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, matching the last push from about 10 years ago. This materially increases abandonment and fix-availability risk.

Package file tree

The package and repository each contain only three files, including the manifest and implementation. This can fit a very small utility, but it also provides little visible project structure or documentation to support ongoing maintenance.

Package scaffolding

The artifact has no README, tests, or changelog; the GitHub release exists but has no release notes. Missing tests and changelog are normal for published artifacts, while the missing README is a minor consumer-transparency gap for a library.

Repo issue activity

There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. This is consistent with a tiny project, but offers no evidence of an active support channel.