Its clear README, MIT license, and lack of install scripts reduce adoption friction. The small, single-owner project offers little evidence to offset its maintenance concerns.
38%
Total Score
25
81
75
The latest release was nearly five years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite a history of 10 releases.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, while its last push was about three years ago. This provides little evidence of active maintenance.
Only one registry publishing maintainer is listed, and the project is backed by an individual rather than an organization. This leaves limited visible continuity if that maintainer stops contributing.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tooling was detected. That weakens automated oversight, although it does not by itself indicate an unsafe release.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap for a package that processes repository access and activity data.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
cl/team Version ^2.3.1 | — | — |
cl/course Version ^2.3.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.