The organization-backed repository matches the package, and install-time scripts are absent. Its tiny README and missing security policy leave little guidance for consumers.
43%
Total Score
50
100
60
75
This is the package's only release, published about four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly limits evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository has recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has been inactive since its initial release.
The artifact contains both a license file and a repository license file, but the detected MIT license conflicts with the manifest's GPL-2.0-or-later declaration. Consumers should resolve which terms govern the release.
A README is present, but it contains only 15 characters and provides virtually no usage guidance. The absence of tests and a changelog in the published artifact is normal packaging practice, while the repository also provides no tests or changelog.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, though it is not evidence of a security defect by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
drupal/search_api_solr Version 4.x-dev | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.