Tests, a changelog, release notes, and repository documentation support a mature project. Commit concentration and unpinned workflow actions add continuity and build-hygiene concerns, despite organization backing and read-only permissions.
84%
Total Score
88
100
94
83
Two contributors were active, but one made 11 of 12 recent commits, giving that contributor a 92% share. Organization backing partly offsets the concentration, but continuity still depends heavily on one person.
The project uses Make and Composer for builds, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The missing scanner is a modest transparency and hygiene gap, not evidence of unsafe code.
The repository has no security policy. This leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear for a network-facing WebSocket library.
Both workflows use read-only permissions and the audit found no injection or other high-confidence findings, but all 16 action references are unpinned. That weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene without creating a severe risk on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^1.1 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/polyfill-php80 Version ^1.26 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.