The repository is not archived, carries a clear MIT license, and has a useful README with repository tests. Its workflow uses four unpinned actions and the project has no security policy, leaving avoidable maintenance and build-trust gaps.
58%
Total Score
50
100
88
75
The package has had no release in nearly five years, with zero releases in the last 12 months. Its earlier release cadence and eight total releases show a real project history, but do not offset the current inactivity.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has been inactive for several years. The repository's non-archived status is only partial reassurance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For this small library that is a modest process gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, though not a standalone reason to reject the dependency.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, sinks, or audit findings, and it does not grant top-level write permissions. However, all four action references are unpinned, creating a build reproducibility and update-trust weakness.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.